VENDOR-NEUTRAL · EVIDENCE-LED · EXPLAINABLE
A shortlist shaped by your situation.
Twenty-one structured questions turn priorities, maturity and governance into a transparent top three. Every score remains open to challenge.
The goal is not a new tool. The goal is a new way of working.
THIS BROWSER TAB
Saved answers found
Continue with the answers stored in this tab, or clear them and start again.
PUBLIC STATIC EDITION
No contact form. No hidden black box.
Choose the answers that best fit your organisation. The scoring runs entirely in your browser and produces an immediate report.
Saved only in this browser tab. Use Reset answers to remove the session copy.
YOUR EVIDENCE-LED OUTCOME
A shortlist you can challenge.
PROCESS × TECHNOLOGY
Maturity path
CLIENT FIT
Primary archetype
RECOMMENDATION
Top three and trade-offs
The matrix score and client-fit adjustment remain visible as separate steps.
DESIGN CHOICE
Recommended architecture
SEPARATE ROLES
Solution layers
Adjacent services and technology stay outside the platform ranking.
PHASED CHANGE
Process and technology roadmap
EXPLAINABILITY
Confidence and decision trace
See what moved the result and which proof points still need validation.
FULL MARKET VIEW
Transparent weighted longlist
This result is a transparent decision hypothesis, not a substitute for vendor due diligence, reference checks or a representative PoC.